In the end, the vast majority boils down to contradictory talking points and trying to shape a desired narrative. There are now fact-checking websites that are designed to counter other fact-checking websites who likewise want to pretend to have the market cornered on factual information. This has predictably been countered by a slew of authoritative-sounding rebuttals stating that everything is above board and nobody should bother worrying about government overreach as vehicles are outfitted with driver monitoring systems. Queries have only increased in 2023, as more people began creating content suggesting that tomorrow’s cars will be capable of being shut down by police for any reason. Though it doesn’t get all that specific in terms of what that entails and gives an incredible amount of leeway to federal regulators.ĭue to having previously speculated on the matter myself, I’m routinely asked what the end result will be. But the pertinent legislation actually focuses on combating impaired motorists by mandating “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology” as standard equipment. The claim hangs responsibility on the extremely broad Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that was passed in November of 2021. Usually referenced as a “kill switch,” the device is supposed to be required on every new automobile manufactured after 2025. government has mandated vehicle hardware that would allow authorities to wrestle control away from the driver. This year has seen a surge of panicked reports discussing how the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |